CONTRIBUTION TO LEPTOSPIROSIS SURVEILLANCE IN FRANCE IN 2004


Introduction

In 2004, the CNR received 5967 serological  and 76 bacteriological analyses.
The total number of recorded leptospirosis cases is 679 (close to the 671 cases observed in 2003. Among them, only 236 (including 7 PCR alone and 1 culture alone diagnosed cases) have been recorded in continental France (Table 1).

As in 2003 although in opposition to what is usually noticed, more cases have been in recorded in DOMs (overseas « departments ») than in TOMs (overseas territories). The highest serological incidence rate is observed inFrench West Indies : Guadeloupe (41.2) (Table 3), Martinique (18.9) (Table 4), then in Indian Ocean : La Reunion (9.2)  (Table 5) and finally South America : Guyane (3.8) (Table 6). Concerning TOMs, in 2004 as in 2003, the incidence is unusuallly  low : Mayotte in Indian Ocean (12.2) (Table 7) and in Pacific Ocean : New Caledonia (6.1) (Table 8) and Tahiti (6) (Table 9).

Epidemiological trends and surveillance

Three distinct cases definitions are used according to the considered area. The aim is to not take into account the residual low titers in serology, the frequency of which is quite different from an area to another one.

*1) In New Caledonia, the incidence is so high (often > 100/100000) that, if considered, the prevalence of residual low titers would lead to overestimation of the disease. Confirmed cases are defined as bacteriologically or PCR confirmed ones and/or seroconverted patients (four fold increase in titer). Probable cases correspond to 2).

*2) In high endemicity area (usually < 50/100000) such as La Reunion and French Polynesia, a so-called "clinical" cut off (1/400 or more in Micro Agglutination Test: MAT against any of the pathogenic antigens) is used in order to prevent overestimation due to residual titers.

*3) In low endemicity areas, a so-called "epidemiological" cut off of 1/100 is considered. Indeed the low residual titers prevalence is unsignificant and, in opposition, if used, the 1/400 cut off would lead to underestimation of many cases due to the chronologically non-optimal sampling. It would also be the case for early treated leptospiroses or those due to Grippotyphosa serogroups (often characterized by low titers). This definition is used in French West Indies, French Guyana and continental France. In these conditions, the case definition is a compromise between (serological) prevalence and incidence rates.

In French West Indies, we used this definition N°3. However the analyses recently dramatically increased (for instance they increased from  233 in 2003 to 571 in 2004). In these conditions, the spectrum of demands for analyses has been enlarging. In this less precisely targetted context, serological scares were increasingly detected : Guadeloupe 2004 : 183 cases with definition one and 121 with definition 2 (Table 3), and Martinique respectively 72 and 33 (Table 4). We decided to use in the future the definition 2 for French West Indies.

The number of cases in 2004 in Continental France (236 serological and/or bacteriological cases) (Table 1) is lower to the mean nuber of the last five years (300). Such a low number has not been recorded since 1992. The decreasing trend is dispatched on the whole year. The maximum is observed in september (44 cases) and October (34 cases) (Table 1).

On the geographical point of view (continental France), the 2004 decreasing incidence is general (0.38 instead of 0.5 last years) (Table 2). It is observed as well in high incidence areas (only 2 of them are over 1/100000 : Basse Normandie :1.2 and Poitou Charentes: 1.16)   (Table 2), than in normal incidence areas. Only low incidence areas such as PACA, Picardie or Languedoc Roussillon, kept their usual rates which in contrast to others, in 2004 seem higher.

When considering the "departments" in continental France (Table 10) (Fig 1), contrasts are sharper. Five reach or even are over 10 cases, but if for 3 of them it is usual: Nord, Paris and Ardennes with incidence rates respectively of 0.6, 0.7 and 3.4, concerning Seine Maritime and Calvados they do increase their usual incidence rates: respectively 0.93 and 1.54 in 2004.
On the whole, in the 2 Normandie regions, has been observed a recrudescence of Grippotyphosa cases in autumn.
It also the cas for Poitou Charentes. (Table 1) (Table 2).

Concerning TOMs, in New Caledonia (Table 8), as in 2003 the climate dry and cool  and in Tahiti (Table 7) the lack of local access to leptospirosis biological confirmation could explain the low number of cases recorde in the French Territories of the Pacific Ocean (Table 2).

Concerning DOMs, the French West Indies and mainly Guadeloupe recorded very high numbers of cases. This could be due to a quite rainy year. For instance in may in Guadeloupe, heavy rains have fallen ten days long.


Publications in 2004 concerning Leptospira (research and CNR)

Provenance : Bases  A methylated phosphate group and four amide-linked acyl chains in Leptospira interrogans lipid A - The membrane anchor of an unusual lipopolysaccharide that activates TLR2
Authors :  Que-Gewirth, NLS, Ribeiro, AA, Kalb, SR, Cotter, RJ, Bulach, DM, Adler, B, Saint Girons, I, Werts, C, Raetz, CRH
Source  :  Journal of Biological Chemistry. 279(24):25420-25429, 2004


Provenance : Bases  Risk factors for leptospirosis in metropolitan France: Results of a national case-control study, 1999-2000
Authors :  Nardone, A, Capek, I, Baranton, G, Campese, C, Postic, D, Vaillant, R, Lienard, M, Desenclos, JC
Source  :  Clinical Infectious Diseases. 39(5):751-753, 2004